LAYER 01 / ISOLATE
Ephemeral Escrows
Single-use execution accounts are designed to isolate intents. Real custody requires audited programs and independently verifiable authorization.
Private routing by design. No persistent browser wallet permissions. Explore ephemeral intent paths in a high-fidelity Solana prototype.
Interact with a simulated ephemeral settlement flow.
No market feed or transaction is connected. Estimates use static demo rates.
Set up your destination to explore the route.
No blockchain transaction · No deposit address generated
An optical metaphor translated into temporary execution contexts, fragmented paths and permission-minimized interaction.
LAYER 01 / ISOLATE
Single-use execution accounts are designed to isolate intents. Real custody requires audited programs and independently verifiable authorization.
LAYER 02 / SPLIT
Routing intents through multiple pools seeks reduced direct-path correlation. Public blockchain transactions remain observable.
LAYER 03 / SETTLE
Avoid persistent wallet approvals in the browser. Moving assets still requires user authorization through a secure mechanism.
03 / OPTICAL ROUTE LAB · NEW
Switch between the three intended route profiles and inspect a conceptual execution graph. The diagram is illustrative, not a live on-chain route.
One venue and a short execution path. Simplest structure, limited routing diversification.
04 / LIQUIDITY FABRIC
No live liquidity pool is connected. Figures shown solely for interface design.
05 / FEE DISTRIBUTION ENGINE
Model the proposed 0.35% fee breakdown against hypothetical daily swap volume.
ILLUSTRATIVE DAILY VOLUME
SIMULATED DAILY FLOW
Hypothetical gross fee allocations only. No staker payouts or investment returns are guaranteed.
06 / EXECUTION JOURNEY
A proposed transient receiving account provides an isolated execution context.
A router explores liquidity paths. Multiple hops do not automatically create anonymity.
A target address receives the output under audited settlement and finality rules.
07 / PRIVACY DESIGN
| CAPABILITY | TYPICAL DEX | MIRAGE DESIGN OBJECTIVE |
|---|---|---|
| Wallet connection | Often required | Extension-free interface |
| Browser permissions | App-dependent | No persistent approval |
| Transaction graph | Publicly analyzable | Public; reduced correlation is a research objective |
| RPC metadata | Provider-dependent | Minimize retention and access |
| MEV exposure | Depends on execution | Route-aware mitigation target |
08 / PROOFS AND RELAYER HEALTH
No authorized MIRAGE relay endpoint has been provided.
A response from public RPC is not a MIRAGE health check.
Independent audit reports and deployed program IDs have not been supplied.
09 / OPERATIONAL RULES
Good privacy design requires verifiable software, minimal information retention and transparent risk disclosure.
THE OPTICAL FUTURE
Explore the architecture behind MIRAGE.